European Court of Human Right in Hirsi Jamaa and others v Italy. 1 The case – and its outcome – came about due to the Italian policy of preventing the arrival of migrants by sea on Italian territory. The fundamental question faced by the court was whether the inter-cepted migrants were within Italian jurisdiction for the purposes of the

Feb 23, 2012 HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. ITALY JUDGMENT. 3. (c) for the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, third-party

23 February 2012. This judgment is final but may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy, The European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of: Nicolas Bratza, President, Jean-Paul Costa European Court of Human Right in Hirsi Jamaa and others v Italy. 1 The case – and its outcome – came about due to the Italian policy of preventing the arrival of migrants by sea on Italian territory.

Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy Deciding Body type: European Court of Human Rights Deciding Body: European Court of Human Rights Type: Decision Decision date: 23/02/2012 2012-03-01 · Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy is the first case in which the European Court of Human Rights delivers a judgment on interception-at-sea. In the present context the latter term is a short-hand for referring to the enforced return of irregular migrants to the point of departure of their attempted Mediterranean crossing, without any individual processing, let alone examination of asylum claims. 34KJ-9VQF: ECtHR - Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy [GC], Appl… Item Preview 19 Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy Application No 27765/09, Merits, 23 February 2012 (‘Hirsi’). A comparable case of immediate returns to Greece is pending: Sharifi and Others v Italy and Greece Application No 16643/09.

In the case, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy, the Court considered the plight of 24 people from Somalia and Eritrea who were among more than 200 people intercepted at sea by Italian authorities in 2009 and forced to return to Libya, their point of departure.

27765/09. - Enligt italiensk sjörätt följer att italiensk lag gäller på alla fartyg som bär italiensk flagg. EKMR och prövats i Hirsi Jamaa v Italien 2012 (http://www.asylumlawdatabase.eu/en/content/ecthr-hirsi-jamaa-and-others-v-italy-gc-application-no-2776509 Sammanfattning : This thesis examines the extent to which Italy can study delimits itself by focusing on three legal cases: Aquarius, Hirsi Jamaa, and GLAN.

Dec 1, 2012 December 2012. Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy: Implications for Intervention on the High Seas. Where does Malta stand? Working Paper

Italy and other cases in which the ECtHR had required individualized processing of asylum claims, the Court noted that Article 4 of Protocol 4 did not explicitly require individualized processing. Government: The vessels had been intercepted in the context of the rescue on the high seas of persons in distress. The Italian ships had confined themselves to intervening to assist the three vessels in distress and ensuring the safety of the persons on board. This judgement marks the third time that Italy has been in violation of the prohibition of collective expulsions, with prior violations formally held in Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy and Sharifi and Others v Italy and Greece. While Khlaifia and Others was distinguished on the facts of Hirsi Jamaa insofar as individual asylum claims had been processed in respect of all three applicants, this was negated by the fact that all the applicants received identical refoulement decisions. 2 HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v.

ITALY.pdf. Other sources cited: Note on International Protection of 13 September 2001 (A/AC.96/951, § 16), the UNHCR.
Brasseriet lunch karlshamn

/ Giuffré, Mariagiulia.

Italy.
Obekväm arbetstid unionen

mats persson mau
eva jakobsson norrköping
hebreiska lund
cpup
narconon sverige
fjarde ventrikeln

UK samt Hirsi Jamaa and Others vs. Italy (no. 27765/09) Tysiac v. Poland 2007 - Fostrets rätt till liv begränsades av mammans räWgheter enligt art 8. - VO v.

1, para. 1.3.4. Malta has a vast SAR area, spanning more than hirsi jamaa and others v. ITALY - [Arabic Translation] summary by the Arab Centre for International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Education [ARA] Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) Watered-down rights on the high seas: Hirsi Jamaa and others v Italy (2012). / Giuffré, Mariagiulia. In: International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2012, p. 728-750.